Hi Christian, On 2025-06-24 16:17, Christian BAYLE wrote: > I think i fixed the issue in a different way in experimental package > by reusing ROCM_DOCS_REMOTE_DETAILS
Fine by me. You could also check with upstream, if upstreaming the patch is an option for you. > I think it should be a rather better option to push the latest version > of python3-rocm-docs in sid, don't know if it's still possible. > What do you think should be preferable ? Oh I didn't see that. I built against experimental because it was configured as the default branch. I think you might as well release the newest version 1.20 to sid if you feel like it. I don't think there are many users yet that could break, and the 6.4 updates need it. It's out of the question for trixie anyway, so I wouldn't worry too much. Best, Christian
