Hi Helmut, On 2025-05-13 23:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2025-04-25 21:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > * Making libftdipp (and thus boost) optional is difficult, because the > > > CMake files installed into libftdi1-dev contain information about > > > libftdipp1-dev and that goes missing if you -DFTDIPP:BOOL=OFF, so > > > it'd be unreproducible. > > > > One way would be to stop using boost, as it seems to only be used for > > boost::shared_ptr, so there might be an alternative. But that kind of > > change has to be done at the upstream level. > > I have just submitted a patch doing that, let's wait for the review from > upstream: > > http://developer.intra2net.com/mailarchive/html/libftdi/2025/msg00013.html
The patch got accepted. Is it something we need to have in trixie, or have you found a way to workaround the issue in the cross bootstrap process? In addition, with libboost-dev removed from Build-Depends and from the libftdipp1-dev Depends, do we still need to add a nopython profile? This part is not trivial. Note that the libboost-test-dev <!nocheck> Build-Depends is still needed. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
