Hi, On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 12:38:49PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > I confirm that the package builds ok in both testing and unstable right now. > > The problem would happen if the version of quickjs in unstable propagates > to testing before the updated edbrowse.
OK. That doesn't look likely, because the diff doesn't look like something that would be unblocked. It might also be useful to investigate adding an autopackagetest to edbrowse to catch these type of changes (but that would probably be someting for after the freeze). > Not sure how to express that using BTS metadata, I hope somebody else > knows how to do that. Good question :) I don't know a good way to tell version tracking that the version in testing isn't affected, while the version number of that package is affected by the bug. The only workaround I can come up with is to remove the version tracking info entirely from this bug. As the bug is closed, this means the BTS now thinks it doesn't affect any suite, which is correct. For people wondering: no, removing the 'trixie' tag is not the correct way to do this. Having a bug tagged 'sid', but not with the tag for the current testing will give unwanted and unexpected results. Thanks, Ivo
