Hello, On Tue, 3 Jun 2025, at 12:53, Lee Garrett wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:58:24 +0200 "Andrej Shadura" <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 30 May 2025, at 00:12, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> > Where do we go from here? If there's some kind of unofficial "The >> > Borg Collective is open to all DDs, like the debian/collab-maint >> > group" that should be documented, but I don't think the silence is ok. >> > If it's an approved inside joke, can we at least put an easter egg >> > somewhere?
>> > Would it be alright if Geoffroy and I officially joined the team? >> You have been assimilated. Resistance is futile ๐ >> More seriously though, yes, you're part of the team^W collective if you do >> the work and care about the packages. That said, I personally never used >> borgmatic, I mostly sponsored it or did some maintenance because someone had >> to. >> Do you have the necessary Salsa access? > Hi, I'm also going to chime in here and say I'd like to maintain > borgmatic, as I also use it extensively for personal backups. > Looking at the fact that the borg collective only maintains two packages, > and one is not actively maintained, would it make sense to just put > both packages in debian/collab-maint and dissolve the team? We can > still keep the borg jokes for debconfs. The packages are already in the Debian group, so itโs just the Maintainer field and the corresponding Tracker team. Which are useful for notifications and grouping in general, so it makes sense to keep it. I will add you both to the Tracker team. -- Cheers, Andrej
