Hi, On 2025-06-01 12:04, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi, > > first of all thanks for noticing and raising this! > > > > > The balboa package provides /usr/bin/balboa-backend-console which is > > > > statically linked against glibc. > > > > > > > > glibc is mostly using a LGPL license which requires that the full source > > > > code of the incorporating binary package be made available. According to > > > > Debian Policy ยง7.8 [1] such a binary package MUST list the glibc source > > > > package (and possibly others) in the Built-Using: field. > > > > > > Please find attached a patch to fix that issue. > > > > In the meantime I have been pointed out at dh-builtusing. Please find > > attached a patch with that alternative. > > Now that I look at it, I don't even see a reason why these binaries need to > be built statically at all. I would prefer to just patch the Makefiles to > create dynamically linked binaries, which I understand would also address > the raised licensing issue, right?
Yep, dynamically linking the balboa-backend-console is another way to fix the issue (and also means balboa does not need to be rebuilt for each new glibc upload). Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
