On 2025-05-30 Aurelien Jarno <aure...@debian.org> wrote:
> control: tag -1 + patch

> Hi,

> On 2025-05-29 22:53, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: gpgv-static
> > Version: 2.1.15-9
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 7.8
> > 
> > Dear maintainer,
> > 
> > The gpgv-static package provides /usr/bin/gpgv-static which is
> > statically linked against glibc.
> > 
> > glibc is mostly is mostly licensed under the LGPL, which requires that
> > the full source code of the incorporating binary package be made
> > available. According to Debian Policy ยง7.8 [1] such a binary package
> > MUST list the glibc source package (and possibly others) in the
> > Built-Using: field.

Hello Aureien,

thanks for the report.

> Please find attached a patch to fix that.
[...]

I do not think that is sufficient. Looking at debian/rules gpgv-static
is built with the same configure flags as the gpgv udeb package and there
we find:
ametzler@argenau:/tmp$ objdump -p udeb/usr/bin/gpgv  | grep NEEDED
  NEEDED               libz.so.1
  NEEDED               libgcrypt.so.20
  NEEDED               libgpg-error.so.0
  NEEDED               libc.so.6

I will take a look at dh-builtusing, hopefull it will limit the ugliness.

cu Andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

Reply via email to