Could these be selected with UDD for all uploads between two dates (then and now).
Ok, here is a list of packages meeting the following conditions: - build-depends on cdbs - last uploaded between 2025-04-08 and 2025-05-27 2025-04-09 libiptcdata 1.0.5-2.4 2025-04-09 vim-scripts 20210124.4 2025-04-13 oss4 4.2-build2020-5 2025-04-24 x2gobroker 0.0.4.3-4.3 2025-05-04 dhelp 0.6.31 2025-05-04 libmessage-passing-filter-regexp-perl 0.05-5 2025-05-04 libmodule-install-copyright-perl 0.009-4 2025-05-04 libmodule-install-doapchangesets-perl 0.206-4 2025-05-04 libmodule-install-doap-perl 0.006-4 2025-05-04 libmodule-install-rdf-perl 0.009-4 2025-05-04 libmoosex-arrayref-perl 0.005-4 2025-05-04 libpath-router-perl 0.15-4 2025-05-04 librdf-trinex-serializer-mockturtlesoup-perl 0.006-4 2025-05-04 librdf-vcard-perl 0.012-4 2025-05-05 haskell-ogma-core 1.7.0-2 2025-05-07 haskell-charsetdetect-ae 1.1.0.4-7.1 2025-05-09 haskell-ogma-cli 1.7.0-2 2025-05-24 ijs 0.35-15.3 ( If somebody could double-check the above, it would be great ) Now we could try building with old cdbs and new cdbs to see if there is any difference using diffoscope. Most packages in the above list are arch:all so there is very little chance to be misbuilt due to config.guess/config.sub. Maybe the other block that was also removed: config_rpath := $(shell find $(DEB_SRCDIR) \( -type f -or -type l \) -name config.rpath has more chances to create misbuilds. (my personal bet is that the impact is going to be zero). Thanks.
