Hi, backports is not release team territory. But not that during the freeze I think that the rules to only upload once packages reached testing is important. Not everything will migrate until trixie is released.
Cheers On 2025-05-25 18:50:00 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > seems I fucked-up your mail address when trying to add you in CC. See > below... > > Best regards, > Micha > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: unblock dhcpcd > Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 18:47:55 +0200 > From: Micha Lenk <mi...@debian.org> > To: Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> > CC: 1105...@bugs.debian.org, "Sebastian Ramacher > <sramacher"@respighi.debian.org > > > > Hi Martin-Éric, > > On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:13:22 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> > wrote: > > On 2025-05-22 12:04:31 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 May 2025 15:32:43 +0000 Sebastian Ramacher > > > <sramac...@respighi.debian.org> wrote: > > > > Unblocked. > > > > Please note that the unblock didn't work. Instead, the delay got > > > lenghtened from 10 to 20 days. > > > > It did: > > > > Migration status for dhcpcd (1:10.1.0-10 to 1:10.1.0-11): Waiting for > > test results or another package, or too young (no action required now - > > check later) > > Issues preventing migration: > > ∙ ∙ Too young, only 13 of 20 days old > > Additional info: > > ∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK - > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/d/dhcpcd.html > > ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for dhcpcd/1:10.1.0-11: amd64: Pass, arm64: No tests, > > superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), armel: No tests, > > superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: No tests, > > superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), i386: No tests, superficial > > or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: No tests, superficial or > > marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), riscv64: No tests, superficial or marked > > flaky ♻ (reference ♻), s390x: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻ > > (reference ♻) > > ∙ ∙ Reproducible on amd64 - info ♻ > > ∙ ∙ Reproducible on arm64 - info ♻ > > ∙ ∙ Waiting for reproducibility test results on armhf - info ♻ > > ∙ ∙ Reproducible on i386 - info ♻ > > ∙ ∙ Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by sramacher > > > > The change in the age requirement is due to the start of the hard > > freeze. > Please note, currently the dhcpcd package in bookworm-backports is newer > than the package in trixie. This means, if dhcpcd 1:10.1.0-11 doesn't > migrate before trixie is released, we will end up with a situation where > systems upgrading from bookworm + bookworm-backports to trixie and having > the dhcpcd from bookworm-backports installed will have their dhcpcd package > remain on version 1:10.1.0-11~bpo12+1 from bookworm-backports. > > @Sebastian, I don't know whether this needs to be tracked in some way by the > release team. Will you take care of that in case we need it? > > @Martin-Éric, please, in the future don't upload versions to > stable-backports which have not migrated to testing yet. > > Best regards, > Micha -- Sebastian Ramacher
