On 2025-05-24 19:49:07 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2025-05-24 19:30, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2025-05-24 15:58:02 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > [ ] I reviewed all changes and I approve them > > > No, this is not "my" package. I'm just trying to prevent removal > > > of sasview. > > > > With "978 files changed, 431012 insertions(+), 18227 deletions(-)" this > > is impossible for us to review. I am afraid that it is too late for this > > new upstream release (and it would also not have qualified as targetted > > fix during soft freeze). Closing > > > Fair enough. But can you identify why Bug#1106409 in magics++ is affecting > sasview?
dak rm -Rn -s testing magics++ plus reverse dependencies lists sasview after the third or fourth iteration of adding broken packages. There are a few new binaries on s390x blocked on magics++. If there are new builds or uploads that are blocked, a revert of magics++ would be appreciated. Otherwise, I think we can tag #1106409 as trixie-ignore once we get closer to the release. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
