On May 17, Martina Ferrari <t...@tina.pm> wrote:
I have recently updated much of my email server setup, including DKIM signing and validation, and publishing DMARC records. Since I changed the DMARC policy away from p=none (as that it is supposed to be only for testing purposes),This is not really correct... A restrictive DMARC policy should be used if a domain is subject to spoofing (e.g. because it is a phishing target). But p=none is a totally valid configuration.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
