Source: unagi Version: 0.3.4-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: Arnaud Fontaine <ar...@debian.org>, Package Salvaging Team <team+salv...@tracker.debian.org>
Dear maintainer, Your package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1] initiative and I was considering migrating the package to Salsa as well as moderinsing the packaging. However, when locking at it I wonder whether this time is well spent. I wonder whether removing unagi from Debian is more senible since: * It is a leaf package. * Popcon was always low and is decreasing https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=unagi&show_installed=on&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1 * Seems to be obsolete and largely unmaintained upstream * Most users today rely on modern compositing managers This bug just serves as a basis to discuss the removal of this package. It would be great of you could raise your opinion in the next month. In case the package should be kept in unstable, please answer accordingly. In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this bug report: Control: severity -1 normal Control: retitle -1 RM: unagi -- RoM; orphaned upstream, possibly not useful any more Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:unagi If you (or some interested user) will not respond I might bump this bug to severity serious after Trixie release to raise more awareness and will reassigned the bug after a sufficient waiting period. In case you disagree with the above, please add a wontfix tag to this bug. Control: tags -1 + wontfix This would be some signal for me to spent time into moving the package to Salsa in case you might agree with this move. As stated earlier your package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1] initiative, which aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to familiarize newcomers with a consistent Git-based workflow. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12.22-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE:de Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
