On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 6:50 PM Olek Wojnar <o...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Alexandre, > > > On 5/13/25 19:30, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since Muammar has retired, would you please > > consider adopting adopting libsilly alongside cegui-mk2; > > as this is a building block of CEGUI and has no other use > > (for now) ? > > I'm guessing this was directed at Vincent? For the record, I was > surprised to see cegui back in testing. I was purposely not updating it > (and had just not gotten around to requesting removal from sid) because > it didn't seem like there was any interest in keeping it. My personal > opinion, for what it's worth, is that the upstream development seems > stalled and I don't think the package is appropriate to keep in Debian > at this time.
I don't really have an opinion on whether we keep cegui in the archive or not, but irrlicht is a build-dep for cegui and not the other way around, so it doesn't really impact irrlicht one way or the other. If cegui gets removed, then irrlicht just becomes a leaf package, which I think is fine. Regards, Vincent
