Hi Sergio, On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 08:38:40PM -0400, Sergio Zamora wrote: > Hi Salvatore, > > thanks for responding. This means I should stay at 6.1.129-1 and not > upgrade to current one (6.1.135-1) untill we get newer version?
No not really, maybe I missunderstood you what you were saying. The initial report was filled with 6.1.129-1, with a *regression* from 6..128 to 6.1.129, and that you later found out that it was a non-issue (with message https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102518#19). So can you clarify? Is the issue still present? Is the issue present with the most current version available? (6.1.135-1 and upcoming 6.1.137-1 for this weekend's point release)? Regards, Salvatore
