Hi Graham, Would be helpful if you could have a look at bug#1104206.
Damage of requiring a binNMU is already done, and reverting to older release will only miss a few bugfixes and look ugly and cost more time. The purpose of splitting the source into multiple packages was done to *simplify* transitions, not complicate them. The binNMUs are all against *virtually the same* source package, as Alexandre have already pointed out, so I fail to see how that can be a dramatically risky affair to relink the code against itself. It seems that Sebastian raising concerns about unreliable API resolving by the uWSGI source upstream is an issue independent of this binNMU request. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
