Noah Meyerhans <no...@debian.org> writes:

> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 05:04:33PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>> For dovecot in trixie, I'm considering reverting channel binding support
>> altogether. That'll force us to drop SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS and
>> SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS support, but I'd rather do that than ship dovecot 2.3
>> again, which is the most likely alternative. (This assumes that I don't
>> find a proper fix for the regression.)
>
> For the record, dovecot upstream was able to come up with a fix.  See
>
> https://dovecot.org/mailman3/archives/list/dove...@dovecot.org/message/O54EAGLIXXHMOH7BQCCKHHB3Z32HDWVR/
>
> I've incorporated their fix into the package and uploaded it with
> version 1:2.4.1+dfsg1-3
>
> I've confirmed that this resolves the autopkgtest failures in gsasl and
> will go ahead with an NMU to update it for dovecot 2.4's configuration
> syntax.

The testing migration seems a bit unclear to me, can you take a look if
this will actually migrate?  It is scheduled for autoremoval right now.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gsasl
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libgssglue

I think you need a dependence on 'dovecot (>= 2.4~)' in
gsasl/libgssglue, and a 'Breaks: gsasl (<< 2.2.2-1.1~), libgsasl (<<
0.9-1.1~)' in dovecot.

Feel free to merge your merge requests and push release tags into the
git repository, I gave them thumbs up:

https://salsa.debian.org/xmpp-team/gsasl/-/merge_requests/2
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libgssglue/-/merge_requests/3

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to