Simon Josefsson writes ("Re: Bug#1104854: binNMUs can cause ma-same violations
in eg manpages"):
> In this case, is the problem triggered by this line?
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/autogen/-/blob/8b4268fa779deaba862a7938ee0d5f051860d8e7/debian/rules#L11
If we're editing thie package, I think we should just get rid of the
timestamps in the manpages rather than trying to control more sensibly
which (sort-of-fake) timestamp we put in there.
Those dates in manpages are not really useful - they're a relic from a
time when one would print manpages out and want to know if the
printout was too out of date. The source-code-last-touched date is
not very useful any more even for that niche use case.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
