Hi Jonas e.a., systraq ships /etc/systraq/filetraq.default since 2004-05 . Usage of this file is documented in /usr/share/doc/systraq/manual.html :
,-- | | 2.5.2. filetraq.conf | |[...] | | If you don't like filetraq's default diff style, but, like me, prefer unified | diff, do | | # rm -f /etc/default/filetraq | # ln -s /etc/systraq/filetraq.default /etc/default/filetraq | `-- Therefore, I feel this bug was fixed in systraq (0.0.20040804-1) . Le Sun, May 29, 2005 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Sergio Talens-Oliag a écrit : > El Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:28:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard va escriure: > > >>Package: filetraq > > >>Severity: normal > > >> > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >>The emails sent contains reverse diffs. > > >> > > >>Confusing to get a notice of lines added when they are in fact removed... > > >· > > >· > > > I don't believe that this is a bug, if you see the three years old file > > > /usr/share/doc/filetraq/README.Debian, you'll see that you can change > > > the > > > diff options and its order using the /etc/default/filetraq file, the > > > default > > > is the order of the original script. > >· > > Well, maybe this is then not a bug in filetraq, but instead in systraq > > (which uses filetraq for spitting out the emails and I believe is less > > than three years old)? >· > Feel free to reasing the bug to systraq, probably a wishlist agaist that > package would be a good idea; adding a note for the users to tell them to > look at the filetraq README.Debian or explaining that using the file > /etc/default/filetraq they can use a different diff order or different diff > options should be enough. >·
