> I imagine something like this (inspired by the recent #374049): > > > d-shlibs/d-devlibdeps \ > --override 's/libstdc++6-dev// # BUG#374049' \ > --override 's/libstdc++5-dev// # BUG#374049 with sarge backport' \ > debian/mp4-0-dev.substvars debian/tmp/usr/lib/libmp4av.so \ > debian/tmp/usr/lib/libmpeg4ip_gnu.so \ > debian/tmp/usr/lib/libmp4v2.so > > Also the files debian/d-shlibs-overrides and > debian/$PACKAGE.d-shlibs-overrides could be consulted as well. > > Please not the support for comments. I believe sed supports this already > but if my memory is wrong then a simple grep in front of it would do the > trick. > > The regexes would need to be used _before_ hardcoded ones, I believe, in > order to be able to possibly override existing ones. But I am not quite > sure about that. > > The use of such overrides is of course discouraged - it would be much > better if the tool itself contained support for all possible scenarios. > I suggest the use of overrides should trigger a notice (which also lists > all comments, if any) promoting to file wishlist bugreports :-) > > > How does this sound?
Sounds like a great plan, especially because we'll then have a debugged snippet to add to the hardcoded list. Do you have an implementation handy ? I imagine using shell arrays to hold the parameter and doing a loop. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]