Control: tag -1 - moreinfo

On Fri, 2025-05-02 at 19:59 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 2025-05-02 at 18:54 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > > Using XZ doesn't make sense on sh4 with its small image sizes anyway.
> > 
> > Well, speaking of that, you have not yet reported back on whether my
> > fix-sh7785lcr branch works.  I just rebased this and uploaded fresh
> > packages to <https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/linux-sh4/>.
> > 
> > If we apply this config change on top of that, the kernel image size for
> > sh7785lcr will again go over the 4 MiB limit.  So we would need to
> > either (1) trim the config further or (2) drop the sh7785lcr flavour.  I
> > do not intend to spend more time on (1) so this is really up to you (or
> > other sh4 porters) now.
> 
> Yes, this is still on my TODO list and I have not forgotten it. I will 
> eventually
> come back to this. Currently, the main priority is maintaining the kernel 
> upstream
> as well as getting the SH backend in GCC converted to LRA which is 
> coordinated with
> people from the Dreamcast community.

Then I will drop that flavour, and you can re-add it when you are ready
to do so.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to