Control: fixed -1 3.0.10-1 On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 07:50:26AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > On 2025-04-30 22:59, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > Sorry, I meant 3.0.10, like you did. Uploading it shortly. > > > > As I do not see it unstable, are you still planning to upload 3.0.10 > > to make it for trixie? > > I have uploaded it but I didn't get any email back: > > 2025-04-25 15:44:32,738 - dput[327712]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading > haproxy using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org; directory: > /pub/UploadQueue/) > 2025-04-25 15:44:32,739 - dput[327712]: hook.run_hook - running > allowed-distribution: check whether a local profile permits uploads to the > target distribution > 2025-04-25 15:44:32,743 - dput[327712]: hook.run_hook - running > protected-distribution: warn before uploading to distributions where a > special policy applies > 2025-04-25 15:44:32,746 - dput[327712]: hook.run_hook - running checksum: > verify checksums before uploading > 2025-04-25 15:44:32,752 - dput[327712]: hook.run_hook - running > suite-mismatch: check the target distribution for common errors > 2025-04-25 15:44:32,755 - dput[327712]: hook.run_hook - running gpg: check > GnuPG signatures before the upload > 2025-04-25 15:44:33,545 - dput[327712]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading > haproxy_3.0.10-1.dsc > 2025-04-25 15:44:34,087 - dput[327712]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading > haproxy_3.0.10.orig.tar.gz > 2025-04-25 15:44:35,548 - dput[327712]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading > haproxy_3.0.10-1.debian.tar.xz > 2025-04-25 15:44:36,279 - dput[327712]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading > haproxy_3.0.10-1_amd64.buildinfo > 2025-04-25 15:44:36,822 - dput[327712]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading > haproxy_3.0.10-1_source.changes > > I'll try again.
This time it worked, than you. Not sure we might ask ftp-master to see what went wrong. On the specific issue, my gut feeling is that this is quite under uncommon cicurmstances and a point release update would be enough? But what is your view on it with your maintainers hat on? Adrian already proposed the debdiff for bookworm as well, but might it be sensible to include the other two fixes as well for the open CVEs? Let me please know your maintainers view on this specfic issue so we can decide if a DSA or the next point release is enough. Regards, Salvatore
