Package: ruby-rails-propshaft Version: 1.1.0-3 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer, Usually all rubygems get a ruby-prefixed to the gem name. Any reason to deviate from the standard? I think it'd be better if this package also followed the standard practice of ruby-<gem name> and use ruby-propshaft. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12.22-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
