On 16 April 2025 at 15:35, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 16 April 2025 at 22:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | | On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | | > On 16 April 2025 at 21:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | | > | Source: rjava | | > | Version: 1.0-11-1 | | > | Severity: serious | | > | Justification: FTBFS | | > | Tags: trixie sid ftbfs | | > | User: lu...@debian.org | | > | Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie | | > | | | > | Hi, | | > | | | > | During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed | | > | to build on armel. | | > | | > Can you tru 1.0-11-2, please? It has | | > | | > rjava (1.0-11-2) unstable; urgency=medium | | > | | > * debian/control: Add libzstd-dev to Build-Depends (Closes: #1103203) | | > * debian/control: Set Build-Depends: to current R version | | > * debian/control: Set Standards-Version: to current version | | > | | > -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:59:33 -0500 | | | | Same error with 1.0-11-2 in unstable. Build log attached. | | | | It also fails on the buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rjava&arch=armel&ver=1.0-11-2&stamp=1744803351&raw=0 | | Yikes. That is weird. rJava is an old and stable package, R itself was just | released and I don't think there were any changes for these odder | architectures (ie armel, mipsel64). | | We already skip java-for-R on a few platforms. R itself has | | default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-any !hurd-any] | \ | openjdk-10-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-any !hurd-any] | | and I may have to expand that.
Coincidentally got a patch via the BTS to fix how R (ie r-base-core) configures Java on loong64, but this may help the others too. [1] The new r-base package is building. Is there a way to tickle rebuilds of package r-cran-rjava that does not require a new upload? Else I just make one, depending on the new r-base-core. This _may_ help us here too. Dirk [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103393 -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
