On 4/17/25 12:53 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 17-04-2025 12:49, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 4/17/25 12:16 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
To avoid having to do this on the package side, I (ci.d.n maintainer hat on)
could add your package to the ci.d.n reject_list
That doesn't sound like a good idea because then two people need to do work to
re-enable arm64 again.
My proposal here was that you don't do it, but I do it *instead*. I totally
agree it doesn't make sense we do it both.
Then close this issue once you have or do you want me to close it with an
upload of the verbose changes?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
