Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: n...@debian.org

Dear RT,

As Paul Gevers helpfully clarified in #1102599,

In transition context, we generally consider "small" when numbers are in the 
low single digit. Otherwise we'd want to be involved/informed.

The freeze policy page isn't that specific though:

No large/disruptive changes

Any change which is large or disruptive, which requires coordination or has a 
higher change of regressions is no longer appropriate at this time.

IMHO it's a good idea to be more specific in what "large" and "disruptive" mean.
FWIW, the "which"s that follow fit in "disruptive", but aren't necessarily 
"large".

If I read Paul's review right, the (essentially) transition I asked for isn't 
disruptive, but large.

Thanks.

--
‌    ,Sdrager
Blair Noctis

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to