Hi Helmut,
Il giorno mar 8 apr 2025 alle 09:45:16 +02:00:00, Helmut Grohne
<hel...@subdivi.de> ha scritto:
You may consider it a duplicate, yes. Unfortunately, my tooling is
unable to reopen existing bugs and files duplicates for ones that have
been closed in error.
Don't worry, it's not a big deal.
the conflict
with the bookworm version still remains unaddressed.
android-udev-rules
needs to declare Breaks+Replaces to fix it. That's what this bug
report
is about and if you compare them, you may now spot the subtle
difference
of dropping the trixie/sid version.
[...]
As in the other such
bug for android-udev-rules, I think mitigation M7 should be preferred,
so you may go straight to declaring Conflicts here. In your
debian/changelog, please mention "DEP17 P1 M7" for tracking purposes.
Got it. Thanks for your suggestion! I'll fix this soon.
Bye :)
