Hi Troy,
Am Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:47:22AM -0600 schrieb Troy Heber:
> > Otherwise, I will follow the well-established timing of the ITS
> > procedure, waiting 21 days before performing a Non-Maintainer Upload
> > (NMU) to delayed=10.
>
> It appears there are only two options to the proposed ITN process,
> either active rejection or passive acceptance. Perhaps there should be
> a third option for active acceptance without the need for the 21 day
> delay?
Good hint. This is for sure a misunderstanding. You are the maintainer
of the package in any case and you can perfectly do the upload yourself.
This is actually the most prefered case and I'd happily leave the final
upload to you. It was a pleasure for me to prepare the repository[1].
If you sign the upload and make it a maintainer upload by doing so this
would be great. Just let me know if you want to do so (I've just pushed
a "Closes:" for this ITN bug as well since it makes no sense to keep it
open for any upload)
> I am happy to more forward with the ITN process for this package.
... only that if you upload its no NMU. ;-)
> I will note that the upstream project for Judy is dead, as the last
> upstream release was 2009. I had considered removing it however there
> are still a few packages that depend on it. In any case feel free to
> push the NMU.
Just let me know what you prefer. In any case we should act soon to not
create any conflict with the freeze. While its not a transition since
the code base is the very same it might not be the best idea to upload
non-leaf packages later than today.
Kind regards and sorry if the process is a bit unclear
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/judy
--
https://fam-tille.de
