Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Anyway, I think we should either go for having 1 package > providing both, or have ntp-server be a dummy and empty packages > just having the depends. Maybe we should move those binaries in > ntp-server to the ntp package?
I think dropping ntp-simple and ntp-refclock and putting the binary into ntp-server is a good idea. It's not like a resource-strapped system would use ntp-server anyway; they can use ntpdate. But perhaps such a change should be made on the second upload when we have a little more handle on this. ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
