> I thought I have already replied to that already. can you point me to where you've answered them? i dont see it my email client
> Not sure why, but > since you're asking: let me do it again. > > 1/ No. Please do it yourself, since you're solo-maintaining the package. wow, okay, fair enough. > 2/ Yes. Explore a "git log" and you'll see reference to it in patch > headers. Also, my laptop's config shows the exact file structure psutil > is expecting under that folder, so that's good enough proof. Plus maybe > you should research it yourself if you want to know better. Why asking > me to do that? you are proposing a fix, *you* are the one that should have done the research beforehand. > 3/ No reason. Just like there's no reason to put it first. That's IMO > cosmetic. Feel free to add some polish if you feel like it is important. > I don't, sure. > I feel like it's a waste of time. yep, i feel the same conversing with you. we're done here. i'll handle this bug myself, the NACK to the NMU remains.
