On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 08:57:05AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Are you aware of the nmu in experimental? > > What of it? >
Thanks for looking at our RFS. The nmu in experimental was created as part of the t64 changes, but later analysis by Steve Langasek showed that it was not actually needed. (Discussed in #1063006, note there was a copy and paste error in the -done message for the package name) As far as i understand uploading the new upstream version here will remove the unneeded experimental upload which seems the right course of action (i.e. not create work for -ftp with a RM bug for the experimental version) If version in experimental is gone we are also going to close #1070259, which is also about the status of the version in experimental) Thanks, - Martin Hostettler
