On Thursday, April 3, 2025 12:41:32 PM CEST Peter Blackman wrote: > > Hi Sune, > > Just to clarify, would that avoid the need for a transition? > > In my defence, it seemed incongruous to have upstream version 1.1 > building a binary package named ...-1.0 > but happy to do it that way if that's best.
The number in the package name is an ABI identifier, not a version requirement. Sometimes they match, sometimes they don't. They often don't. /Sune -- I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world. And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist. - zefrank
