Personal opinions:

I think we should start with full functionality, and if someone shows up
later with a usecase for a small one we can add it.

I prefer rustls over openssl, it seems like a more securely designed
software (based on the review from cure53)

//Alex

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, 14:31 Blair Noctis <n...@debian.org> wrote:

> On 27/03/2025 15:07, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> (...)
> > # Optional protocol support
> >
> > The following DNS protocols are optionally supported:
> >
> > - Enable dns-over-rustls for DNS over TLS (DoT)
> > - Enable dns-over-https-rustls for DNS over HTTP/2 (DoH)
> > - Enable dns-over-quic for DNS over QUIC (DoQ)
> > - Enable dns-over-h3 for DNS over HTTP/3 (DoH3)
> (...)
> > We already have most of the crates here, it seems we just need this
> binary.
>
> Yes, despite some feature shenanigans in dependencies,
> hickory-dns itself built relatively easily.
> (As 0.24; 0.25 is unlikely to make it into trixie.)
>
> Though there is one decision to be made:
> whether and which the optional features should be enabled.
>
> In my test build these features are enabled:
> - default = [sqlite, resolver, native-certs, ascii-art]
> - dns-over-h3
> - dns-over-https-rustls (DoH with rustls, other option is disabled
> upstream, -openssl)
> - dns-over-quic
> - dnssec-ring (DNSSEC with ring, other option is -openssl)
> - recursor
>
> referred to as "mostly full" below.
>
> Size wise:
> The default configuration (sqlite, resolver no dns-over-*) weighs in at
> ~5MB.
> The "mostly full" configuration comes at ~12MB,
> or ~10MB with opt-level = 3, lto = true, codegen-units = 1.
> (I don't think it's desirable to have opt-level = 's',
> it's a performance sensitive application.)
> As the size difference is quite significant,
> it might even be feasible to split a default package and a full one?
>
> Feature wise:
> Good to have those secure transports IMO,
> but I'm no expert in this field.
> Maybe some are less desirable?
>
> Backend wise:
> rustls/ring or openssl?
> Split packages for them?
> --
> Sdrager,
> Blair Noctis
>
>

Reply via email to