On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:34:05AM -0800, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Hi Agustin, > Agustin Martin <agmar...@debian.org> writes: > > > This code is supposed to run for both Emacs and XEmacs, which seems not to > > have lexical binding. Since code should not use lexical-binding for that > > reason, first line should probably default to nil (disabled) > > > > ;; -*- lexical-binding: nil -*- > > This is reasonable. But does "lexical-binding: t" take any effect in > XEmacs? It may be OK if this is no-op in XEmacs so that it's only > turned on for GNU Emacs.
Hi, As long as no lexical binding is used, code should work the same in Emacs and XEmacs. However, if lexical binding is ever used in this file, it will not work as expected in XEmacs. I think setting it to nil should force the same behavior in both Emacs and XEmacs. Regards, -- Agustin
