Quoting Dom Rodriguez (2025-03-13 14:48:21) > On 13.03.2025 11:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >Quoting Dom Rodriguez (2025-03-13 01:18:03) > >> It would be useful for `licensecheck` to output SPDX-compliant license > >> identifiers, so that it can be used in SPDX/CycloneDX SBOMs. > > > >Do you mean like this?: > > > >``` > >licensecheck --shortname-scheme=spdx * > >``` > > Perfect, I missed that in the docs. > > However, I note that, for example, GPLv2 licenses are reported as > `GPL-2.0`, which is deprecated by the SPDX license list[0], which > should - probably - be addressed.
The license fulltext itself does not cover any work, so cannot decide if it is -only or -or-later. > I can open a different bug report and close this one if that works for > the team. I'm running `licensecheck` v3.3.9. If you only needed what --shortname-scheme=spdx then yes, makes sense to close this bugreport. If that other issue you wanted to open another bugreport for is the above about GPL-3, then please first check if covered in either of bugs #1052259 or #1081421. You might also be interested in bug#950363 :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
