On 2025-03-13 11:09:11 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 2025-03-11 15:46, schrieb Martin-Éric Racine: > > Welcome. Has there been any progress on this? > > Nope, but I'd volunteer to work on this. > > What name scheme do you suggest for the packages, libav*-nonextra or > libav*-regular or anything else?
Please don't. I don't think that we should support this use case in the archive. If a package supports dlopening multiple versions of libav libraries, then that can and should be expressed in their Depends to make it clear which version that they support. On a different note, the dependencies of the spotify package are unnecessarily complex since none of the -extra variants are needed to be listed there. The -extra meta package is there to help users to get the -extra variants where they exist. But Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
