On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 19:31:09 +0100 Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote:
Package: bacon Version: 3.11.0-1+b1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + ruby-baconbacon has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error from dpkg. The file /usr/bin/bacon is contained in the packages * bacon/3.11.0-1+b1 as present in unstable * ruby-bacon/1.2.0-6.1 as present in bookworm|bullseye|trixie|unstable
I've talked to upstream, they suggested a Breaks for the time being. I agree and would close this bug by doing so in an upcoming upload. If we are to dispute the package name, neither of the two sides is overwhelmingly advantageous: ruby-bacon is there for over a decade, but it's Ruby specific and has a low popcon; bacon (src:rust-bacon) is more generic, and would predictably grow more popcon due to its modern audience, but is only recently packaged. It would become a political problem, rather than a technical one. -- Sdrager, Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature