On 2025-03-11 12.23, ca...@allfreemail.net wrote: > The issue and patch are so trivial that I don't want any attribution, > I'd just like to see it dealt with, feel free to fix it all under your > own name. Thanks.
Out of curiosity: did you find the extra dependency actually annoying in some scenario, or are you just doing QA cleanups on packages? To be clear: I welcome the change, I'd just like to know if there's a use case I'm missing. Thanks, Paride
