Dear maintainers,
unless a certain strict Debian rule formally enforces a transition, I
don't think that a transition is really necessary because still the only
packages depending on libdbus-c++-1-0v5 are ffado-dbus-server and
jami-daemon (cf. #1018772 [1]). I have double-checked both to be sure
that they only have a dependency on libdbus-c++-1.so.0 but not on
libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.0 or libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.0. The only other
packages depending on these libraries are libdbus-c++-bin and
libdbus-c++-dev themselves which have updated dependencies in Debian
experimental.
Best regards,
Thomas Uhle
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1018772#5
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-08-15 16:24:45 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:dbus-c++
> X-Debbugs-Cc: dbus-...@packages.debian.org
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
>
> libdbus-c++-1-0v5 has been split in the experimental version 0.9.0-13 into
> three packages containing each of the shared object files which were
previously
> all in libdbus-c++-1-0v5. libdbus-c++-1-0v5 did not gain dependencies on the
> two other packages, so in my opinion, a transition is needed. The ABIs have
> not changed, however.
In that case libdbus-c++1-0v5 needs to gain dependencies for proper
upgrades from bookworm to trixie. please let us know once that is
fixed.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
