-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 12:47 +0000, Douglas Kosovic wrote: > Hi Yves-Alexis, > > > Sorry for breaking your use case, I didn't really check the reverse > > dependencies of the strongswan metapackage (to be honest that > > metapackage was mostly intended for end-users, not packagers). > > No worries. > > Currently network-manager-l2tp package has the following dependency: > > strongswan | libreswan > > So that metapackage came in handy as it isn't possible to have > dependencies like: > > (strongswan-starter & strongswan-charon) | libreswan
Ah yes indeed. > > As d/control now has strongswan-charon having a dependency on > strongswan-starter, I might wait for the next strongswan-charon revision > which has that dependency so I could then use something like the > following dependency in network-manager-l2tp: > > strongswan-charon (>= 6.0.0-3) | libreswan > Yes I think this is what makes the more sense. Sorry I messed up the strongswan-charon -> strongswan-starter dependency in 6.0.0-1 Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAme/G5UACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFt6Gwf8ChNJaBGXAe3qkHsm108Gzq0WaXgMk32ddsSQgIlU3iwj6Hp+me70Vnlq I8NpsGkU7SIxwwcmfbYuuvvTeW11WSFnhfuyQFFw6codMp+c2tj1bopuP+2QMlNe 47Quefl+dLxZqe07h1ZOxD8onvKKvGNt4Z+Ph659xOBBcPOiwmDfrIrAw8bAVOmE 22bZKXVY3yy/AwqkHXW0XnD3eYwAKHqknmHxOE634WsP9pEV+LFsJtJ3jzUMRkBr NTOG6l+ruO/b16G2J1DYJsBvBayRCe0cDLnfMYfoOkTGLtsI3C4cJ5h5IE6IEXAR PYUOmEu9Oo+ELzMyXN2ykRU97OQyxg== =7bSA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
