Hi I'll leave this question to Mika. I have no memory of being involved in this package. I guess I have acted as uploader at some point, but I have clue when.
Cheers // Ola On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 20:17, Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > your package bfm came up as a candidate for the Bug of the Day[1] and so > I had a look into this package. The Bug of the Day project intends to > demonstrate newcomers how bugs can be closed and in principle bfm would > be a good target with a bug tagged patch. However, before doing so I'd > like to hear your opinion whether working on this package is > sustainable. Bug #967271 "depends on deprecated GTK 2" might mean that > we can't keep this package in Debian in the long run. So first I want > to know whether you are happy if we: > > 1. Move the package to https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bfm > 2. Fix the bugs in CC to this mail > 3. Upgrade the packaging to latest packaging standards > (debhelper compat level, Standards-Version, lintian-brush) > > If you are happy about this and consider it helpful for the next couple > of years please let me know and I would NMU the result of this work or > leave it for your inspection to do a maintainer upload. Otherwise I > could consider filing a RoM bug report to remove the package from > Debian. > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/tille/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks#bug-of-the-day > > -- > https://fam-tille.de > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / o...@debian.org o...@inguza.com \ | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 | ---------------------------------------------------------------
