Am Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 07:12:27AM +0100 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> > IMHO the dotconf example shows that these established procedures do not
> > seem to be sufficient.
>
> IMHO it does not show that. There are no long-unfixed RC bugs in dotconf.
I tend to disagree. We have two bugs with patches. One is 6 years old
and is affecting the functionality of the package (#913337) and one is 3
years old about multiarch:same. Both did not received any answer. If
we are honest about "Our Priorities are Our Users" we can't ignore such
things and just care for RC bugs.
Probably we need to discuss the term "not actively maintained by
maintainer" but IMHO examples like this should be included into the
consideration.
> If
> people would like to take over long term maintenanceship of dotconf, I'd
> suggest these people should just talk to Shane.
MIA team found out that all emails we know are not working. So this is
no option.
> I personally would do that in
> a non-public message.
I personally prefer public discussion but it does not matter anyway
since its not possible as said above.
Have a nice weekend
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
