reassign 825423 linux-base
found 825423 4.2
close 825423 4.3
thanks
El 20/2/25 a las 11:19, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 06:12:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 17:59 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 04:33:58PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
You can use the command ischroot from the debianutils package.
Why would I want to add a dependency on that? [...]
You really wouldn't, because debianutils is essential.
Oh duh, thanks for pointing that out.
is this bug still present or can we close this old bug?
Seems fixed. I just tried this:
sbuild -d bookworm supermin
on a stable system still running 6.1.0-29
(upgraded to -31, but not rebooted yet).
The build process installed linux-image-6.1.0-29-amd64,
the package was built, and sbuild was able to remove
the kernel even if it had the same version as the
running kernel:
[...]
Removing linux-image-amd64 (6.1.123-1) ...
Removing linux-image-6.1.0-29-amd64 (6.1.123-1) ...
W: Last kernel image has been removed, so removing the default symlinks
/etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools:
update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-6.1.0-29-amd64
Removing initramfs-tools (0.142+deb12u1) ...
Removing initramfs-tools-core (0.142+deb12u1) ...
Apparently linux-check-removal is smarter now:
---------
If the currently running kernel matches VERSION, linux-check-removal
will normally prompt the user to confirm this potentially dangerous
action and will fail if the user chooses to abort. However, if the
current environment is in a chroot or container, or if debconf
prompts are disabled, it will always succeed without prompting.
---------
I traced that to commit [4a695de] in linux-base, dated 2016-06-06
(which is just two days later than the last message from Ben
in this thread).
Add linux-check-removal command for use by package prerm scripts
Use the existing logic (roughly) and exactly the same debconf template
and translations that are currently included in src:linux.
Therefore, I think this was fixed in linux-base 4.3.
Closing myself.
Thanks a lot!
