Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I was letting Junichi take care of all issues relative to this file, > > > > since he is the author and has CVS access. I'll let him answer, but I > > > > think your suggestion is a good idea. > > > > > > > > There's also this one to look at: > > > > > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364234 > > > > > > Humph, thanks. > > > > > > considering > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/strftime.html > > > > > > and considering xemacs help for format-time-string claims: > > > The number of options reflects the `strftime' function. > > > > > > that's a bug on xemacs... > > > > :-) > > > > Might still take a long time to get fixed if you choose to not work > > around it. Up to you. Please reassign the bug to xemacs if you decide > > to go that route. > > I've discovered the mew hackers have done a better job (without fork). > > (defsubst mew-time-tmzn-int () > (let ((tz (car (current-time-zone)))) > (if (< tz 0) > (format "-%02d%02d" (/ (- tz) 3600) (/ (% (- tz) 3600) 60)) > (format "+%02d%02d" (/ tz 3600) (/ (% tz 3600) 60))))) > > (defsubst mew-time-ctz-to-rfc (time) > (let ((system-time-locale "C") > (tmzn-int (mew-time-tmzn-int))) > ;; XEmacs doesn't have %z > (format (format-time-string "%a, %d %b %Y %T %%s (%Z)" time) tmzn-int))) > > I'm inclined to use this instead.
Go for it! -- Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
