On 2024-07-30 1:35 PM, Paride Legovini wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote: >> One of the main advantages of the SOP CLI is that it is a standardized >> interface, which means having to hardcode specific implementations in >> code kind of defeats the point of that interface. > > I was also surprised by the lack of a sop alternative, especially given > that sqopv provides a sopv alternative. > > Maybe the idea is to wait for the IETF sop standard to be accepted > before starting to ship sop?
Hi Daniel and other maintainers, Any news on this? I'd like to port a tool to the stateless interface, but not having sop available under its standard name is discouraging. Would reviewing/applying Guillem's patch and uploading rust-sequoia-sop with the sop alternative be welcome work? Thanks! Paride
