unblock 373387 by 373628 thanks (This block was a false positive. While we use cdbs a little, we don't actually use it for anything python-related.)
First, it's not clear to me what advantages anyone would get from "fixing" the subversion packaging to comply with current python policy. I do not see what is broken about our current package. It doesn't hard-code python 2.3 anywhere, so it's binNMUable. (Well, other than the "Provides: python2.3-subversion", which can probably go away now. It's left over from renaming the package from that.) It's even less clear what point there is in supporting multiple simultaneous python versions, except to avoid the need for a binNMU once every 3 years. python-subversion has very few users. Building the module code twice, and making the package hard to backport to stable, is enough of a pain to make it reasonable to ask what benefit these users will get in return.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
