On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 08:41:50AM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > Ah, now I got it - you fixed it in 2.0.1+cvs20050208-4 already.
FYI: -4 was never uploaded to debian, just available on my personal website. > > However, my thought about the not-yet-processed package is because > 2.0.1+cvs20050208-6 still depends on libgd2-xpm exclusively. > > You changed the Build-Deps to `libgd2-noxpm-dev | libgd2-xpm-dev' and > most likely still built the package with libgd2-xpm-dev installed, which > leads to an exclusive package dependency for libgd2-xpm. If you would > have built the package with libgd2-noxpm-dev installed, the package > dependency would have been changed to `libgd2-noxpm | libgd2-xpm'. > A Build-Dep to libgd2-noxpm-dev only would enforce this. Unfortunately I'm not allowed to upload packages since I'm not a Debian developer myself (and thus my sponsor builds the package before upload). I'll talk to him and see if we can work this out for i386 (the other arches should hopefully have the correct dependencies as they where auto-built on the buildd's). Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
