Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 29.01.25 um 15:08 schrieb Yavor Doganov: > > Also, shouldn't this code snippet be in prerm instead of preinst > > (and only applicable for the "upgrade" action)? > > You can't retroactively add code to existing packages. Can you be more > specific, why you want to add that code to the prerm of the "existing" > package?
Sorry, it should be in preinst, of course. My head is elsewhere. > >> But mine is different (bookworm, i386) and I haven't modified it: > > Just curious: What does `hostname -i` return for your system? 192.168.0.1 > I'm aware that the configuration of the system might have changed > between the initial installation of gnustep-base-runtime and the > upgrade to trixie. So the above recommendation wouldn't cover a 100%. Right, but it's still something worth doing. Thanks for the idea. > Do you think that the `hostname -i` output is somewhat stable? Of course not, and this postinst script has always bugged me (I didn't write it).
