On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 09:20:57PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > I guess I'd be willing to accommodate this request, but instead of > bringing gdb-minimal back, I believe gdb-multiarch should be resurrected > instead (again, if we really get to this point). The former seems to be > more "used" than the latter, so I'd prefer to keep the merge of > gdb-minimal with gdb. >
Please at least add a transitional package for gdb-minimal, otherwise people are stuck at the old version of gdb-minimal and can't notice the NEWS. -- Shengjing Zhu
