> It seems you are reusing a bugreport about one build failure for
another bug about a differently caused build failure.
No, I'm not. If you read my previous email to the BTS:
> Sorry, yesterday I didn't notice 0.4.7-2 is in exp, so downgrading
severity to normal. I will retry with 0.4.5-1 when I find some time.
As stated above, I was testing 0.4.5-1 to see if this bug only affected
experimental or not, from which it depended the severity of this bug
since an exp FTBFS is far less serious than a testing/unstable FTBFS. I
could not do so because in the meantime 0.4.5-1 became B-D
uninstallable, so in the end I just tagged the bug as experimental for
lack of more information, having confirmed it only in experimental. Of
course we (you) then discovered this is not related to experimental, but
this is beyond the point.
As for the B-D uninstallability of 0.4.5-1, I was not going to discuss
it further weren't it for your email, nor am I going to submit another
bug report since you seem to be well aware of dashmap needing to be
updated for oxigraph: you did it just yesterday in [1], and 0.4.7-2 is
already fixed for that.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/oxigraph/-/commit/517715e2cf4b99c7c949a2ae517efb071f1eafb2
