Control: severity -1 important On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:53:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Gregor, Salut ! > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > > > on amd64. > > That's an interesting one :) > Indeed :) :) > > > > uid=65534 topuid=10 euid=104 path='/tmp' at > > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/File/Temp.pm line 686. > > > > File::Temp::_is_safe() called at > > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/File/Temp.pm line 785 > > > > File::Temp::_is_verysafe() called at > > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/File/Temp.pm line 478 > > > > File::Temp::_gettemp() called at > > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/File/Temp.pm line 1482 > > > > File::Temp::tempfile() called at > > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/File/Temp.pm line 1083 > > > > File::Temp::new() called at > > > > /build/reproducible-path/libsgml-parser-opensp-perl-0.994/blib/lib/SGML/Parser/OpenSP.pm > > > > line 65 > > > > SGML::Parser::OpenSP::parse_string() called at t/20passfd.t > > > > line 31 > > > > Test::Exception::lives_ok() called at t/20passfd.t line 31 > > > > > > > > # Failed test 'parse_string with temp file name' > > > > # at t/20passfd.t line 31. > > > > # died: Error in tempfile() using template /tmp/XXXXXXXXXX: Parent > > > > directory (/tmp/) is not safe (Directory owned neither by root nor the > > > > current user) at > > > > /build/reproducible-path/libsgml-parser-opensp-perl-0.994/blib/lib/SGML/Parser/OpenSP.pm > > > > line 65. > > > > I can't reproduce this in my cowbuilder chroot, and I wonder what > > happened tp /tmp in the build environment … > Maybe related to me using sbuild from backports and the unshare backend? > But at the same time, it did not fail on 2025-01-07 when I was already > using the same setup. I'm totally ignorant wrt this unshare thingy … Does it affect ownership of /tmp in any way? Or might there be some other cause for "Parent directory (/tmp/) is not safe (Directory owned neither by root nor the current user)"? In any case: Ownership of /tmp seems out of scope for a specific package. > I tried it again and reproduced it... But I can also confirm that it > builds fine on another machine... (so it's OK to downgrade) Ok, downgrading to important … Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
