On Monday, January 20, 2025 10:17:33 PM MST Xiyue Deng wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Once again I'm missing your mail and am not able to provide a timely > reply (sad). Anyway, please see my replies below. > > On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:47:08 +0000 Phil Wyett <philip.wy...@kathenas.org> > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > > > Xiyue, > > > > Preamble... > > > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution > > to the Debian project. > > > > This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder > > to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There > > is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based > > upon information provided in the review. > > > > Review... > > > > 1. Build: > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > > * sbuild [2]: Good > > > > 2. Lintian [3]: Good > > > > 3. Licenses [4]: Issue > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/geiser-0.31.1$ lrc > > en: Versions: recon 3.3 check 3.3.9-1 > > > > Parsing Source Tree .... > > Reading d/copyright .... > > Running licensecheck .... > > > > d/copyright | licensecheck > > > > GFDL-1.3 | GFDL-1.3+ doc/geiser.texi > > This should be fine, as the package is using GFDL-1.3 with "no Invariant > Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts."[1], which is > DFSG compliant (see "Exceptions" on the DFSGLicense Wiki[2]).
1. You should list this license as GFDL-NIV-1.3, with NIV standing for No Invariant Sections. For example, see: https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/copyright? ref_type=heads#L17 2. I think the actual question being raised is if this GFDL-NIV-1.3 or GFDL-NIV-1.3+. -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.